LDR   02808nam^^22003733a^4500
001        AA00001320_00001
005        20200408120921.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        200327n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
024 7    |a HV8073.5.T63 2017_ToddVictoria |2 BU-Local
050    4 |a HV8073.5.T63 2017
100 1    |a Todd, Victoria.
245 10 |a Gender influences on eyewitness memory |h [electronic resource].
260        |a Miami, Fla. : |b Barry University, |c 2017.
300        |a 48 leaves : |b illustrations ; |c 28 cm
490        |a Barry University Theses -- College of Arts and Sciences – Psychology.
502        |a Thesis (M.S.)--Barry University, 2017.
504        |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 37-40).
506        |a Copyright Victoria Todd. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
520 3    |a Instances of those wrongly accused of convictions sent to prison defines the magnitude of the influence of eyewitness identification. Previous research that has investigated the contributing causes of innocent people becoming imprisoned has highlighted eyewitness misidentification as the greatest contributor to wrongful convictions (“The Innocence Project,” n.d.). It has been suggested that neither sex has better memory, rather that the two differ in terms of the type of information that is remembered best. Specifically, females and males tend to be accurate on different types of items, indicative of their differential interests and attention paid to those items. The lack of information suggesting which gender is better at recognizing a once-seen face is of great concern and was examined. Findings did not favor either sex as having better memory, however this was the result of an overwhelming number of female participants. Despite the inconclusive data, this study’s limitations and discussion may be pivotal for legal counsel to continue reconsidering the value of eyewitness memory, a social-cognitive process subject to suggestibility.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Barry University, |d 2020. |f (Barry University Digital Collections) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Barry University Archives and Special Collections.
650    0 |a Eyewitness identification.
650    0 |a Criminal investigation |x Psychological aspects.
650    0 |a Memory |x Psychological aspects.
650    0 |a Sex differences.
655    0 |a Academic theses.
830    0 |a Barry University Digital Collections.
830    0 |a Theses and Dissertations.
852        |a BUDC |c Theses and Dissertations
856 40 |u http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001320/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a https:/budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/13/20/00001/HV8073_5_T63 2017_ToddVictoriathm.jpg
997        |a Theses and Dissertations


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.