LDR   04610nam^^22003733a^4500
001        AA00001323_00001
005        20200408132631.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        200327n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
024 7    |a HV9081.M56 2005_MinceyBarrett |2 BU-Local
050    4 |a HV9081.M56 2005
100 1    |a Mincey, Barrett Eben.
245 10 |a Perceptions of successful graduates of juvenile residential programs who have recidivated : a phenomenological study |h [electronic resource].
260        |a Miami, Fla. : |b Barry University, |c 2005.
300        |a xii, 118 leaves ; |c 28 cm
490        |a Barry University Dissertations -- School of Education.
502        |a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Barry University, 2005.
504        |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 111-117).
506        |a Copyright Barrett E. Mincey. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
520 3    |a Historical Perspective : Juvenile delinquency in America dates as far back as the 1800s. The problem of juvenile delinquency has been addressed in multifaceted ways. Under the Illinois Act of 1899, juveniles who committed delinquent acts (or status offenses) were handled judicially by dependency courts. These courts utilized a social-welfare emphasis to rehabilitate juvenile offenders. The premise was that society was partially responsible for juveniles’ delinquent behaviors and that through rehabilitation, juvenile crime could be diminished. By the 1960s, however, a philosophical change was in order. Laws were modified, and court systems throughout the United States demanded more punitive approaches to combat juvenile delinquency. Protecting the community and accountability became the philosophical linchpins that drove this juvenile delinquency debate. Method : This qualitative study explored the essence of juvenile delinquency and recidivism: its causes and correlates, its relation to social capital and communities, the role of the family, and the myriad roles of residential treatment programs at rehabilitating these young offenders. The philosophical paradigm undergirding the study is a critical theorist’s perspective. A critical evaluation of the juvenile justice system established a variety of perspectives in an effort to bring about holistic change. This study was structured in the form of a phenomenology. The “lived experiences” of successful graduates of juvenile residential programs were collected and analyzed. While examining a variety of constraints, the researcher took on an insider’s (emic) perspective during the data collection procedure. Major Findings : The participants of this study shared varying perspectives regarding their experiences within juvenile residential treatment programs. Participants characterized counselors as competent, compassionate, sensitive, and trustworthy. Good counselors were described as effective, serving as reformers in the process of juvenile rehabilitation. Ineffective counselors and other program staff failed to foster integrative relationships with some of the participants. They were perceived as ill-prepared, uncaring, and, in some instances, hostile. The majority of the participants cited positive aspects about their educational services and general program environments. Teachers used non-traditional methods to gain the interests of their students. Practical concepts and examples were used to transform the participants into believing in structured learning. These same positive regards were shared about the programs’ environments. These programs used a “tough love” approach to “break these hard-core participants down and build them back up.” After they were shown how past transgressions led them to their delinquent states, they then were provided tools for change.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Barry University, |d 2020. |f (Barry University Digital Collections) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Barry University Archives and Special Collections.
650    0 |a Juvenile recidivists.
650    0 |a Juvenile delinquents |x United States.
650    0 |a Juvenile delinquents |x Education |x United States.
650    0 |a Juvenile delinquents |x Rehabilitation.
655    0 |a Academic theses.
830    0 |a Barry University Digital Collections.
830    0 |a Theses and Dissertations.
852        |a BUDC |c Theses and Dissertations
856 40 |u http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001323/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a https:/budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/13/23/00001/HV9081_M56 2005_MinceyBarrettthm.jpg
997        |a Theses and Dissertations


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.