LDR   03116nam^^22003733a^4500
001        AA00001611_00001
005        20200424115628.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        200424n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
024 7    |a RC946.H47 2019_HerreraValerioMariaCristina |2 BU-Local
050    4 |a RC946.H47 2019
100        |a Herrera Valerio, Maria Cristina.
245 10 |a Correlation between pelvic tilt angle, hip range of motion, and hip muscle torque ratio |h [electronic resource].
260        |a Miami, Fla. : |b Barry University, |c 2019.
300        |a 68 leaves : |b illustrations ; |c 28 cm
490        |a Barry University Theses -- College of Nursing and Health Sciences.
502        |a Thesis (M.S.)--Barry University, 2019.
504        |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 58-61).
506        |a Copyright Maria C. Herrera Valerio. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
520 4    |a Pelvic tilt (PT) imbalances are associated with injuries of the lower limbs and of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. There is a lack of evidence that correlates anterior and posterior PT angles with limited hip range of motion (HROM) and hip muscles torques ratios (HMTR). Purpose: to examine the correlation between anterior/posterior PT and HROM, hip flexors and extensors (HF/E) torque ratio, and hip adductors and abductors (HA/A) torque ratio. Methods: Twenty-six subjects participated in this study, fifteen females (22.0 ± 2.8 years old, 163.5 ± 7.5 cm, 65.9 ± 10.4 kg) and eleven males (22.0 ± 2.2 years old, 178.5 ± 4.5 cm, 78.4 ± 8.7 kg). Hip muscle torque were collected with an isokinetic dynamometer, five trials at 30 deg/s and at 60 deg/s. The measurement of both PT in standing natural position, and HROM in lunge position with right (RL) and left (LL) limb, were recorded through a Motion Analysis System. Results: There were no significant correlations between PT and the dependent variables: HIR (r=-.16, p=.43 RL, and r=-.02, p=.89 LL), HER (r=-.11, p=.58 RL, and r=-.25, p=.21 LL), HA/D at 30 deg/s (r=-.19 p=.34 RL, and r=-.17 p=.38 LL) and at 60 deg/s (r=-.13 p=.51 RL, and r=-.12 p=.55 LL), HF/E at 30 deg/s (r=32 p=.10 RL, and r=.06 p=.75 LL) and at 60 deg/s (r=-.7 p=.70 RL, and r=-.19 p=.33 LL). Conclusion: the measurement of PT angle in standing natural position is not a good predictor for the HROM and HMTR.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Barry University, |d 2020. |f (Barry University Digital Collections) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Barry University Archives and Special Collections.
650    0 |a Pelvic bones.
650    0 |a Extremities (Anatomy).
650    0 |a Pelvis.
650    0 |a Hip joint.
655    0 |a Academic theses.
830    0 |a Barry University Digital Collections.
830    0 |a Theses and Dissertations.
852        |a BUDC |c Theses and Dissertations
856 40 |u http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001611/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a https:/budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/16/11/00001/RC946_H47 2019_HerreraValerioMariaCristinathm.jpg
997        |a Theses and Dissertations


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.