LDR   02795nam^^22003613a^4500
001        AA00001864_00001
005        20200515154457.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        200515n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
024 7    |a SK33.B66 2017_BoneDavid |2 BU-Local
050    4 |a SK33.B66 2017
100 1    |a Bone, David,.
245 10 |a Effect of perceived access on hunting effort |h [electronic resource].
260        |a Miami, Fla. : |b Barry University, |c 2017.
300        |a viii, 71 leaves ; |c 28 cm
490        |a Barry University Theses -- School of Human Performance and Leisure Sciences.
502        |a Thesis (M.S.)--Barry University, 2017.
504        |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 44-48).
506        |a Copyright David Bone. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
520 3    |a Hunting participation has been declining for the last thirty years. This is a serious threat to the sport as hunters are aging and the rate of new hunters entering the sport is decreasing. There are four major constraints to hunting participation, which include personal constraints, access constraints, demographic constraints and cost constraints; of these constraints, access is the constraint with the most external control. Because of this, the dimensions or constraints of access need to be studied. This study examines the constraints to perceived access, which combines real and subjective dimensions. The study found 10 dimensions to perceived access of hunting which are: Sites too crowded, Difficulty finding animals/game, Access to private land, Sites are too far away, Lack of information, Lotteries, no opportunity when I want to hunt, Inadequate facilities, Bonus points and Lack of training facilities. The study also tested if perceived access affected hunting effort, which it did not. However, the participants of the study are more experienced than the national average. State agencies can use the access constraints to adapt management plans to reflect the needs of hunter.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Barry University, |d 2020. |f (Barry University Digital Collections) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Barry University Archives and Special Collections.
650    0 |a Hunting |x United States.
650    0 |a Hunting |x Economic aspects.
650    0 |a Wildlife |x Conservation |x United States.
655    0 |a Academic theses.
830    0 |a Barry University Digital Collections.
830    0 |a Theses and Dissertations.
852        |a BUDC |c Theses and Dissertations
856 40 |u http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001864/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a https:/budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/18/64/00001/SK33_B66 2017_BoneDavidthm.jpg
997        |a Theses and Dissertations


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.