LDR   03072nam^^22003733a^4500
001        AA00001509_00001
005        20200416132229.0
006        m^^^^^o^^d^^^^^^^^
007        cr^^n^---ma^mp
008        200416n^^^^^^^^xx^^^^^^o^^^^^|||^u^eng^d
024 7    |a HQ751.C65 2012_CollinsGraceSlone |2 BU-Local
050    4 |a HQ751.C65 2012
100 1    |a Collins, Grace Slone.
245 10 |a Perfect races to perfect babies : the moral impermissibility of genetic enhancements |h [electronic resource].
260        |a Miami, Fla. : |b Barry University, |c 2012.
300        |a vi, 40 leaves ; |c 28 cm
490        |a Barry University Theses -- Honors Program.
502        |a Thesis (Honors)--Barry University, 2012.
504        |a Includes bibliographic references (leaves 39-40).
506        |a Copyright Grace Slone Collins. Permission granted to Barry University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder.
520 3    |a The primary purpose of my thesis is to argue that embryonic genetic enhancements are morally impermissible. First, I examine the biological and social eugenics movements of the twentieth century through a detailed historical analysis of early racial scientists and biologically based laws of Nazi Germany. I make arguments in opposition to social eugenics based on its numerous social consequences. Next, I discuss social eugenics in order to show the initial scientific ideas and social transitions that have preceded the modern field of genetic research. In critiquing the morality of genetic enhancements, I address important distinctions for various genetic terms. Then, I introduce and outline two bioethicists’ arguments in favor of genetic enhancements and two in opposition, showing common objections and discrepancies in opinions within the field. 1 next propose five arguments in support of my position that genetic enhancements are morally impermissible. These arguments address objections and opposing arguments, as well as strengthen arguments in favor of my position. Finally, 1 note the weaknesses of my study, and also reflect upon my contribution to not only my fields, philosophy and history, but also the field of genetics. 1 hope that this thesis promotes a deeper understanding of history’s role in future decisions, in addition to urging future generations to critically evaluate the scientific advancements that can dramatically alter human life.
520 0    |a Designer babies.
533        |a Electronic reproduction. |c Barry University, |d 2020. |f (Barry University Digital Collections) |n Mode of access: World Wide Web. |n System requirements: Internet connectivity; Web browser software.
535 1    |a Barry University Archives and Special Collections.
650    0 |a Eugenics.
650    0 |a Heredity.
650    0 |a Genetic regulation.
655    0 |a Academic theses.
830    0 |a Barry University Digital Collections.
830    0 |a Theses and Dissertations.
852        |a BUDC |c Theses and Dissertations
856 40 |u http://sobekcmsrv.barrynet.barry.edu/AA00001509/00001 |y Click here for full text
992 04 |a https:/budc.barry.edu/content/AA/00/00/15/09/00001/HQ751_C65 2012_CollinsGraceSlonethm.jpg
997        |a Theses and Dissertations


The record above was auto-generated from the METS file.